Greg’s latest on CNBC - Is Obama “too tough” on Wall Street?
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009
I can’t believe how the Dem. Strategist tried to say Obama’s plans are less intrusive than the original TARP plan. Obama has fired a CEO, banks have to ask to give bonuses, govt may soon own a majority ofcommon voting stock in major banks and GM. This is LESS intrusive? Wow. It’s hard to hit it all in a short TV seg.
Neither Obama, nor most of Congress has ever run a lemonade stand, let alone a real business. These are the guys who are going to save us?
I don’t think it’s so much Obama being too tough or too weak on Wall St. I think it’s him doing too much…and not enough. Here’s what I mean.
- Obama has done too much: He has continued and expanded on what Bush did to get the government to bail out businesses that made horrible business decisions. This creates moral hazard and takes away many of the corrections in our free market system. We cannot have capitalism on the way up and socialism on the way down. I’m against the bailouts, the wrong use of the TARP funds, government firing CEOs and forcing mergers, etc. The idea that banks are being told they cannot return the government’s money is ludicrous. Does anyone believe Obama and Congress should be running private businesses? Are they qualified to do this? Get the government out of business before it makes things much worse.
- Obama hasn’t done enough: What Obama could do, without hurting the free market system is help increase the rewards for private capital to flow into our economy. He could call for making the Bush tax cuts permanent, cut the cap gains tax to zero for the next two years, cut the business tax from 35% to 20% and create two tax brackets in America - 10% and 25%. Then, get out of the way and watch the private investment roll in.
- Obama and his team need to quit making it up as they go. Everyday it seems like they are coming up with a new plan. The instability spooks the markets.
GK











